PLEASE SEND TO YOUR E-MAIL FRIENDS THIS ATTACHMENT IS 4 OF 12 PAGES YOU WILL RECEIVE. THINK ABOUT IT - MCGRATHE INVOKES 5TH AMENDMENT AT TRIAL OF MAYOR SABATINO KNOWING HE WOULD HAVE TO PERJURE HIMSELF
- MCGRATH TURNS IN HIS LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW WITH “PENDING CHARGES “ RATHER THAN FACE A TRIAL WITH THE STATE BAR KNOWING HE WOULD HAVE TO PERURE HIMSELF
- MODESTO BEE EDITORS REPORT ON MCGRATH PERJURY AT MODESTO BEE OFFICE INTERVIEW BECAUSE IT SUITS THEIR PURPOSE AND BECAUSE THERE IS NO PENALTY FOR MCGRATH PERJURY
QUESTION MODESTO BEE EDITORS AND REPORTER PRINT MCGRATH PERJURY. THEY KNOW IT IS PERJURY BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE DOCUMENTS THAT WILL EVENTUALLY PROVE MCGRATH’S CRIMINALITY IS THERE A PENALTY FOR THE BEE? HAVE THEY FINALLY CLOSED THE CIRCLE? IF THEY COVER UP CORRUPTION ARE THEY NOT CORRUPT< TOMORROW PAGE 5 AND 6 OF DISCIPLINARY CHARGES AGAINST FORMER ATTORNEY PATRICK MCGRATH AND PAST ATTORNEY FOR CARMEN SABATINO….. PLUS A BONUS DOCUMENT Please Click On Read More
6/8/04 $350.00 1492 37 5/20/04 $600.00 1493 38 6/21/04 $450.00 1494 39 7/8/04 $1,000.00 1498 Total $48,475.00 5. On or about August 27, 2004, respondent confessed the misappropriation to the other Board members. To avoid the reporting of his conduct by the HOA to law enforcement, respondent agreed to return the misappropriated funds to the HOA. 6. By November 2004, respondent had repaid the HOA for the monies he had misappropriated. 7.By misappropriating approximately $48,475.00 as Chief Financial Officer of the HOA, respondent committed acts involving moral turptitude, dishonesty and corruption. COUNT TWO Case No. 04-O-14828 Business and Professions Code, Section 6106 (Moral Turpitude-Misappropriation) 8. Respondent willfully violated Business and Professions Code, section 6106, by committing an act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, as follows: 9. In or about April of 1996, Michael Staack (Mr. Staack”) and his wife, Christine Staack (Ms. Staack”) entered into a partnership with respondent and his wife, Susan McGrath (Mrs.McGrath”), forming an agricultural business in Modeto, California named Pinochle Farms, LLC (“Pinocle Farms”). 10. on or about April 10, 1996, respondent filed the articles or organization with the State of California for Pinocle Farms, and was appointed as its Agent, Officer, and Attorney. 11. On or about April 13, 1996, Mr and Mrs Staack, and respondent and Mrs McGrath executed the Operating Agreement for Pinochle Farms (“the Operating Agreement”). According to the Operating Agreement, each party held an equal 25% interest in Pinochel Farms, the parties contributing an initial cash investment in the amount of $13,750.00 each, or $55,000.00 total. 12. In or around May 1999, Pinochle Farms acquired a 51% controlling interest in
|
News 
