Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Sponsored Links

What is my IP

You are connecting to this site from: 38.103.63.61

Latest Events

No Latest Events
Home arrow News arrow Local arrow DESPERATE KRAUSNICK'S LAST GASP
DESPERATE KRAUSNICK'S LAST GASP PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Submitted by Administrator   
Tuesday, 31 October 2006
WHEN WILL THIS man give up?

CLICK ON "READ MORE' FOR THE DETAILS

WELCOME TO THE SABATINO REPORT

 

October 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KRAUSNICK GETS DESPARATE

 

County Counsel Mick Krausnick served a Civil Subpoena to former Mayor Carmen Sabatino today demanding that the Mayor appear in court on November 9, 2006.

 

His subpoena referred to criminal case number 1061284 which was dismissed by Judge Franklin Stephenson.

 

Former Mayor Sabatino is entitled Witness Fees and mileage if he agrees to attend.

 

If he does not attend he could be punished  for contempt and pay a fine of $500.

 

Krausnick is spending 10 to 15 thousand dollar in attempting to collect $50,000 for Sabatino legal defense fees knowing that Sabatino does not have the money to pay as determined by two previous judges including Stephenson.

 

Attorney Frank Carson is continuing to represent Sabatino in the interest of justice.

Carson may be entitled to legal fees since the possibility of contempt would be a charge that would require legal representation.

 

CITY OF MODESTO LIABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES OF FORMER MAYOR

 

City Council Member Janice Keating, who twice demanded that former Mayor Carmen Sabatino resign from office, voted in closed session to instruct the City Attorney and the City Clerk to demand that the District Attorney make up another felony charge against the Mayor.

 

Mayor Sabatino was not guilty of any charge which was brought against him in his position as Mayor.  The City of Modesto spent $10,000 to defend Keating on charges of harassment and discrimination and made a deal with the employee.

 

The County should look to the City for reimbursement of legal fees or absorb the loss as part of the $500,000 spent to investigate the Mayor in the first place.

 

SABATINO REPORT EMAIL “SPOOFED”

 

This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it began to receive over 1.500 of “spam” and junk mail.

 

Maybe that is a sign of our success.  We will deal with it.

Comments (1) add
SUBPOENA FOR WHAT?
written by Tux on October 31, 2006

Carmen, I would ask Frank Carson about this subpoena. Was it signed by a judge? It seems like a last attempt at getting at you that may not have to happen. The case number that was cited in the subpoena represents charges that have been dismissed. I think Frank Carson should represent you in court, and you should exercise the freedoms that our laws afford you. Tux

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 21 November 2006 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Polls

WHY WERE THE REPUBLICANS THUMPED?
 
DO YOU BLAME BUSH FOR IRAQ MESS?
 
SHOULD WE PULL OUT OF IRAQ SOON?
 
What Is Your Opinion Of Ray Simon?
 
SHOULD MSNBC HAVE CANCELED DON IMUS?
 
SHOULD MODESTO FUND GALLO ARTS CENTER?
 
ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE MODESTO CITY COUNCIL?
 

Latest Comment

PUBLIC RECORDS REQUE...
I have heard that Richard Breshears was called in ...
Ya wonder why anyone...
Jesus Christ Bill, haven\'t you had enough with th...
ATTENTION DITTO HEAD...
How can I be wrong? Even most staunch Conservative...
ATTENTION DITTO HEAD...
Your wrong Tux
TODAY ON THE MORNING...
Why would Sabatino allow someone from the Harm Red...